contestada

There is a new brand of water on the market advertised to relieve headaches. It is selling like crazy! When the Food and Drug Administration asked for scientific proof that the water actually does what it claims to do, the owners of the company produced a scientific research study that they had paid a group of scientists to perform. In the study researchers gave this special water to a group of 50 people who claimed to have a headache. The people drank the special water whenever they felt thirsty over a period of 24 hours. After the 24 hours, 99% of the people reported that their headache was gone.
Should the Food and Drug Administration trust this scientific study and allow the company to sell the water with this claim? Would this be an example of science or pseudoscience? Support your answer with at least three reasons.

Respuesta :

muffin155204

Answer:

No, they should not trust the "scientific study" because the average headache last about 4 hours. After the 24 hours itself, the head ache would be gone, that's why 99% always say the headache "disappeared" The only way to prove the special water could do anything is if they did a study of the people who claim to have a headache to drink one bottle of the water and see what happens in the next 2-3 hours.

Explanation:

landonbastinelli

Answer:

This is obvious pseudoscience because the people could be lieing about there headache, because it's a very bonkers product, and there is no actually factual proof supporting there theory.

brainliest???

Otras preguntas