contestada

Read the following excerpt from Levitt and Dubner’s Freakonomics. A key fact of white-collar crime is that we hear about only the very slim fraction of people who are caught cheating. Most embezzlers lead quiet and theoretically happy lives; employees who steal company property are rarely detected. With street crime, meanwhile, that is not the case. A mugging or a burglary or a murder is usually tallied whether or not the criminal is caught. A street crime has a victim, who typically reports the crime to the police, who generate data, which in turn generate thousands of academic papers by criminologists, sociologists, and economists. But white-collar crime presents no obvious victim. In this excerpt, the authors present a comparison between various criminals. an argument in favor of reporting crime. a contrast between different types of crime. an argument against embezzlement.

Respuesta :

Answer:

The answer is C. A contrast between different types of crime

Explanation:

In the excerpt, the authors show a contrast between different types of crime, as shown in option C.

How is this contrast presented?

  • The authors show the differences between street crimes and white-collar crimes.
  • The authors show how the nature of criminals is different.

By contrasting the two types of crime, the authors reinforce the idea of how these crimes have different idealizers, with different natures and lives, since the crimes do not have characteristics in common.

Learn more about contrasts between elements at the link:

https://brainly.com/question/9087023

#SPJ2