Why do reviews often begin with an objective summary of the material being reviewed?

A. So the reviewer can prove that he or she is not biased toward the material

B. So the reviewer can establish whether or not he or she liked the material

C. So the audience can better understand the later criticism of the material

D. So the readers know where they can go to find more information

Reviews begin with an objective summary so that the public can better understand the post-criticism of the material, as shown in option C.

We can arrive at this answer because:

The objective summary has the purpose of presenting the work that is being evaluated by the critic.
This summary allows the public to understand the work and have an information base to understand the criticism and the review that will be presented.
In this way, the critique or review is better understood by the reader, as he or she recognizes the elements being presented, as these elements were visualized in the objective summary.

Thus, we can state that the objective summary introduces the reader to the work and prepares the reader for future information.

More information:

https://brainly.com/question/19327495?referrer=searchResults