NEED THE ANSWER ASAP PLEASE

What inference can be made about the courts and the
practice of gerrymandering?
Baianas
The courts have determined that they have little to
no jurisdiction over the practice.
O The courts have tried to prevent the practice, but
have had little effect.
The courts have worked to support the practice,
which is likely to continue.
The courts have worked to stall the practice and
could stop it altogether in the future.

The inference can be made about the courts and the practice of gerrymandering is that, "The courts have worked to stall the practice of gerrymandering and could stop it altogether in the future."

What are the courts?

Courts are basically the courts of law, where a person or body of persons play an important role and so they have judicial authority to hear and resolve disputes in civil, criminal, or military cases.

What do you mean by gerrymandering?

Gerrymandering refers to the practice of altering the boundaries of electoral districts in order to give an unfair advantage to one political party or group of people over its rivals.

For instance, party leaders can gerrymander their opponents by packing them into a few districts, leaving their own supporters with comfortable party leaders.

Why the courts have decided to stop the practice of gerrymandering?

The courts have decided to stop the practice of gerrymandering in order to make elections more fair, while also gaining equal representation of each section from the population and to allow equal civil rights for entire population.

By stopping the practice of gerrymandering it would also make elections more competitive and challenging. Thus, this will majorly prevent one political party from abusing their power to remain dominant in a country.

Hence, option D is correct.

To learn more about gerrymandering here:

https://brainly.com/question/8352159

#SPJ2