9. Make an argument for or against this statement: “That line between good and evil is permeable,” Zimbardo said. “Any of us can move across it... I argue that we all have the capacity for love and evil — to be Mother Theresa, to be Hitler or Saddam Hussein. It's the situation that brings that out.”

I'm for in this statement, because it's basically children learning from their parents what's good or evil from the parents' experience. Even the person chooses the evil path, there will be thousands of reasons why this person chose this path. Sometimes they'd do for love or just for their own goods.

Explanation:

Answer Link

jayilych4real jayilych4real · Answer 2 · 2021-11-04T14:35:38+01:00

Making an argument for this statement: “That line between good and evil is permeable,” will be:

A person can be either good or evil, depending on the combination of his nature and nurture

According to the given question, we need to support the argument which Zimbardo made about any body being good or bad because the lines of good and evil is quite permeable.

As a result of this, to support the argument, we can see that a person can either be good or bad depending on his nature and nurture.