Answer:
Because it does not present evidence, it does not present conclusions, in addition to presenting a generalized and controversial statement.
Explanation:
The above argument presents a logical fallacy. First, the argument presents widespread and controversial information, without any type of proof, that is, the author of the argument does not present any evidence to prove and confirm his positions, in addition to not presenting a concrete and well-defined conclusion, since the content of the argument does not allow.
