Respuesta :
Answer:
on grounds of 'Equal Protection' laws of the 14th Amendment.
Explanation:
Both Brown V. Board of Education and parents involved in Community Schools v. Seattle presented their case on grounds of 'Equal Protection' laws of the 14th Amendment.
In Brown V. Board of Education, the court ruled that 'separate but equal' was an unconstitutional provision and that the practice of segregation was 'inherently unequal'. It further ruled out that these unequal provisions violated the equal protection laws.
Similarly, the parents involved in Community Schools v. Seattle claimed and argued that racial tiebreaker in district schools subjugated and infringed 'Equal Protection' laws of the 14th Amendment.
Though the initial plan of the racial tiebreaker system was to prevent racial imbalance in schools, the court adjudged that the system was unconstitutional because it, more or less, contributed to unequal opportunity in getting admissions.
Brown v. Board of Education focused on the rules and laws of the Topeka that were enacted in the year 1954 and was in the aspect of the racial segregation of the unconstitutional children of the public schools.
The similarities between the Brown V. Board of Education and Parents are on grounds of 'Equal Protection' laws of the 14th Amendment.
In Brown V. Board of Education, the court ruled out the law 'separate but equal' was an unconstitutional provision and the practice of segregation was 'inherently unequal'. Further, it was ruled out by unequal provisions that violated the equal protection laws.
The parents involved in Community Schools v. Seattle claimed and argued regarding the racial tiebreaker in district schools subjugated and infringed 'Equal Protection' laws of the 14th Amendment.
To know more about the similarity in the facts of Brown V. Board of Education and Parents, refer to the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/4905863
