What is Beveridge's stance on the acquisition of the Philippines
O It would provide economic access to countries in East Asia.
O It would help the United States prevent a conflict with China
O It would stop China from claiming territory in the Philippines
It would allow the United States to shut down Asian markets

What I found on the web, "The senator was an advocate of American imperialism. Among other goals, he supported the annexation of the Phillippines. He believed this to be justified because of the "white man's burden": the idea that Western, white people had the moral duty to educate other less civilized people."

I hope this helps, I always appreciate Brainliest!!! :)

nikitavidya0 nikitavidya0 · Answer 2 · 2022-07-19T15:43:50+02:00

Beveridge's stance on the acquisition of the Philippines is it would provide economic access to countries in East Asia. Thus, option (A) is correct.

What were Beveridge's motives?

Profit was Beveridge's main driving force behind American imperialism, and his racial notion of Anglo-Saxon dominance served as his excuse. His claim that American foreign policy should advance American economic interests.

Beveridge and Carnegie have opposing views on whether the Philippines would increase American wealth.

According to Beveridge, acquiring the Philippines would provide East Asian nations access to the global market. Thus, option (A) is correct.

Learn more about Beveridge and Carnegie here:

https://brainly.com/question/11177362

#SPJ2