The poor lavished money on rich artifacts or dynastic portraits in part because these objects were
a way of communicating their exclusiveness and social power to their contemporaries.
True
False

Respuesta :

The answer is TRUE.

The poor lavished money on rich artifacts or dynastic portraits in part because these objects were a way of communicating their exclusiveness and social power to their contemporaries is True.

Why objects were a way of communicating their exclusiveness and social power to their contemporaries?

  • objects were a way of communicating their exclusiveness and social power to their contemporaries because the poor lavished money on rich artifacts or dynastic portraits in part.
  • So, the poor lavished money on rich artifacts or dynastic portraits in part because these objects were a way of communicating their exclusiveness and social power to their contemporaries.
  • Therefore, the given statement is True.

Hence, the poor lavished money on rich artifacts or dynastic portraits in part because these objects were a way of communicating their exclusiveness and social power to their contemporaries is a True statement.

To learn more about social powers, refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/12008682

#SPJ2