contestada

Question 6 of 10
How do nominal and contemptuous damages differ from one another?
O A. With contemptuous damages, the judge or jury believes the
plaintiff
should pay for bringing the case to court.
O B. With nominal damages, the judge or jury believes the plaintiff
should pay for bringing the case to court.
C. With nominal damages, the judge or jury believes the plaintiff
should not have filed the suit.
O D. With contemptuous damages, the judge or jury believes the
plaintiff should have filed the suit.

Respuesta :

Animedefender223

Answer:

A

Explanation:

Parrain

The difference between nominal and contemptuous damages is that A. With contemptuous damages, the judge or jury believes the plaintiff should pay for bringing the case to court.

What is a contemptuous damage?

These are damages that a Judge imposes on a plaintiff for bringing a matter to the court that the Judge believes has no merit and should never have made it to the courtroom.

This is opposed to a nominal damage that is imposed on the defendant for being found guilty of legally wronging the defendent.

Find out more on court damages at https://brainly.com/question/14001157.

Otras preguntas