My feelings about the way the filmmakers changed the character are it was very unfair to twist such an important detail about how Max Baer felt about the death of his opponent just to make some profit.
The question about whether the decision of the filmmakers to alter the character was ethical is that it was certainly not ethical and many things wrong there.
We should note that movies which are based on true events are not always 100% accurate and as a result of this, they are out to make as much controversial changes as they can in order to make profit off the movie.
Furthermore, it is very likely that the real person Max Baer (or his family) signed a contract with them to share his story, but it is up to the director to make the final changes.
Therefore, was the decision legal?
Was it ethical?
Read more here:
https://brainly.com/question/414008
