nosaibahaldalali10
contestada

PLSSSSSS HELPPPPPPP MEEEEEEEE 50 POINTS!!!!!!!!!!
Read: The Espionage and Sedition Acts were used to suppress not only antiwar sentiment but also politically radical ideas, especially socialist ones. The postmaster general, who had the authority to censor periodicals, declared that “most” socialist publications expressed treasonous ideas.

Question: Based on the paragraph above, we see that suppression of ideas was part of the strategy used by the Wilson administration to guarantee support of the U.S. involvement in WWI. Is it ever okay to use suppression or suspend our Bill of Rights? If so, when is it okay, and why? If not, then why? Remember to include 3 examples as evidence. 2 must be historical based and 1 is personal based.

Respuesta :

Based on the information given, it should be noted that my opinion is that the suppression of the Bill of Rights is okay.

It should be noted that in wartime, there's suppression of the Bill of Rights in order to prevent the release of information that may be useful to the enemy. During World War 1, the letters that were written by British soldiers went through censorship.

There are also cases of censorship by religion such as the Galileo affair. Also, the rights of an individual can be suspended when it's important for public safety.

Learn more about Bill of Rights on:

https://brainly.com/question/2018522

Otras preguntas