Considering the case about above, Daisy is most likely liable for breach duty of loyalty.
Daisy is been regarded as director of Extraction Corporation, which means she should be loyal to that office by following the protocol in performing tasks.
Duty of loyalty simply implies that individual should be loyal to his or her office by following the ethics of the organization.
Therefore, Daisy breached duty of loyalty because, of her opposition to merge the Extraction.
Learn more about breached duty of loyaltyat:https://brainly.com/question/14319735
