contestada

The president isn’t the only person involved in appointing a federal judge. How does a process that puts a check on this power make it more likely that a judge, once appointed, will rule impartially?

Respuesta :

jayilych4real

The process of checks and balances which make it more likely that a judge, once appointed, will rule impartially is:

  • It ensures that there is more than one person, more than one view so any ruling in the future would not be biased to that one view.

Checks and Balances

This is the principle that states that the three arms of government, the Legislature, the Executive and the Judiciary all have separated powers and checks on the activities of each other so that there would not be tyranny.

How this helps

This helps in the appointment of a federal judge as though the President, who is part of the Executive makes a list of federal judges to appoint, it is up to the Congress, part of the Legislature to either accept or reject this nomination and this ensures that the federal judge is not loyal to the president and neglects his duties,

Read more about checks and balances here:

https://brainly.com/question/8927972

Otras preguntas