Read these sentences from paragraph 4.

If we do refuse to allow the rich, desirable, and important Hawaiian Islands permission to become a part of our territory, it will be an act of utter recklessness and indifference in respect to our interests as a nation and our welfare as a people. It is certain that our duty to ourselves requires us to accept this offer.

Why does the language of these sentences make an effective closing to Bingham's argument?

A
Words like "rich" and "welfare" emphasize the economic disparity between the audience and islanders.

B
Words like "recklessness" and "indifference" humiliate the audience members who oppose annexation.

C
Words like "duty" and "nation" call upon the audience's higher values in the matter of Hawaii.

D
Words like "permission" and "respect" remind the audience that they must honor the islanders' wishes.

Respuesta :

The language of these sentences makes an effective closing to Bingham's argument because: C. Words like "duty" and "nation" call upon the audience's higher values in the matter of Hawaii.

What is an Argument?

An argument is the position a person takes on a matter. In this excerpt, Bingham used pathos to appeal to the people's sense of duty towards their nation. This will help them realize that if they failed to act on the matter, they will be doing something wrong.

This is an effective conclusion because it gives the people a cogent reason to act on the matter being discussed.

Learn more about arguments here:

https://brainly.com/question/3775579