contestada

To develop the argument for opposing laws requiring seatbelt use in pick-up trucks, Selection 2 of “Seatbelts in Pick-up Trucks” makes which of the following comparisons?
A
People in the country drive pick-up trucks while people in the city do not.
B
Rural people can determine what affects their personal safety while urban people cannot.
C
Rural drivers travel at slow speeds on unpaved roads with little traffic while urban drivers do not.
D
People working in the agricultural industry must haul fence posts and deliver feed while people in other industries do not.

Respuesta :

adioabiola

The choice which helps develop the argument as described for opposing laws requiring seatbelt use in pick-up trucks is;

  • Choice C: Rural drivers travel at slow speeds on unpaved roads with little traffic while urban drivers do not.

Rural Drivers and Urban drivers

From the excerpts from the book;

It follows that Rural drivers to an extent use the road safely as the drivers travel at slow speeds on unpaved roads unlike Urban drivers whose safety not only depends on his road etiquettes but depends on a large number of other drivers and an increased probability of a reckless one.

Read more on Seatbelts in Pick-up trucks;

https://brainly.com/question/22780396

Otras preguntas