When a justice avoids interpreting the Constitution past its clear words, this is judicial restraint. But when a justice considers wider societal applications in decisions, this is judicial activism.
Judicial activism refers to when a Judge/ Justice decides to consider the implications of their decisions when making court rulings. This can often lead to them making inferences on the Constitution.
This is the opposite of Judicial Restraint where a Judge/ Justice decides to interpret a law within the clear confines and words of the Constitution.
Find out more on Judicial Restraint at https://brainly.com/question/15452280.