Michael and Derrick each completed a separate proof to show that corresponding angles AKG and ELK are congruent. Who completed the proof incorrectly? Explain. (10 points)

Michael completed the proof incorrectly because ∠AKG ≅ ∠AKL are not congruent because they are not vertically opposite angles.
It is defined as the angles when two lines intersect each other and at the intersecting point, some pair of angles are formed which we call vertically opposite angles, as the name describes that they have vertically opposite angles.
As we can see in the steps of proving that corresponding angles AKG and ELK are congruent for Michael work:
The step:
∠AKG ≅ ∠AKL are not congruent because they are not vertically opposite angles as per the definition.
The vertically angles are:
∠AKG ≅ ∠BKL
Thus, Michael completed the proof incorrectly because ∠AKG ≅ ∠AKL are not congruent because they are not vertically opposite angles.
Learn more about the vertically opposite angles here:
brainly.com/question/24287162
#SPJ1