Respuesta :
Good Morning!
Interpersonal relationships and between groups of individuals are important for the development of the world. The sociologist Karl Marx demonstrates that in his studies - although not all of them must be taken literally - that much of what we have today is the fruit of what he calls the "class struggle", that is, the antagonism between classes, as Capitalist and proletarian, for example, is what moves the world. This shock will also be present, in the most contemporary interpretations, in the relations between races and ethnicities: a classic example is the relation between the white man and the African enslaved. This can be seen in countries such as Brazil or the United States (especially in the apartheid era), where race conflicts cause social transformation and change human relations.
hugs!
Interpersonal relationships and between groups of individuals are important for the development of the world. The sociologist Karl Marx demonstrates that in his studies - although not all of them must be taken literally - that much of what we have today is the fruit of what he calls the "class struggle", that is, the antagonism between classes, as Capitalist and proletarian, for example, is what moves the world. This shock will also be present, in the most contemporary interpretations, in the relations between races and ethnicities: a classic example is the relation between the white man and the African enslaved. This can be seen in countries such as Brazil or the United States (especially in the apartheid era), where race conflicts cause social transformation and change human relations.
hugs!
Answer:
The relation between human groups and their consequence in the social structure was one of the objects of study of the famous sociologist Karl Marx. Avoiding to enter into ethical questions about the morality of the systems based on his writings, it is worth noting that Marx's notes are interesting, although partial, in what concerns the idea of class struggle. For him, societies throughout history have always developed through the conflict between the dominator and the dominated, the exploiter and the exploited, or, in more objective terms, the capitalist and the proletarian. For him, the development of history is due to this antagonistic relationship. Its logic can also be applied, for example, to race, since in the case of America, for example, Africans figured as an exploited ethnicity and whites as exploiters. Or, in the question concerning the relationship between man and woman, which historically proves oppressive in certain senses.
