Two individuals signed a contract that was intended to be their entire agreement. the parol evidence rule will prevent the admission of evidence offered to?

Question

rdiem7811 rdiem7811

07-09-2022
Business

contestada

Two individuals signed a contract that was intended to be their entire agreement. the parol evidence rule will prevent the admission of evidence offered to?

Respuesta :

Otras preguntas

I should look at reliable and trustworthy sources when solving problems

which are the catalysts of reaction in living tings

Triangle ABC is similar to triangle PQR, as shown below: Two similar triangles ABC and PQR are shown. Triangle ABC has sides AB equals c, BC equals a, and AC eq

0.2(6x+1)÷3.6=0.5x÷9

What was the federalist papers

Which court is the federal court of original jurisdiction' U.S. District Court State-level criminal court State Supreme Court U.S. Courts of Appeal

4. What is the value of the expression: -14 + 5 + -9

Read the sentence. The lawyer presented a clear argument to the jury it was unbelievable how influenced they were by his case in the hopes of winning the trial.

X^2+y^2-10x-2y+10=0 what is the center and the radius of the circle? Show the work.

Triangle JKL and triangle PQR are similar. What is the measure is side PR?

Baraka1 Baraka1 · Answer 1 · 2022-09-21T00:07:55+02:00

The parol evidence rule will prevent the admission of evidence offered to prove the existence of a contemporaneous oral agreement modifying the contract.

Parol evidence refers to anything that was said, done, or written before the parties signed the agreement or as they signed it.

Therefore anything that was done or said before signing the agreement or contract will pevent the admission of evidence .

https://brainly.com/question/28518809

#SPJ4