The statement that best describes a precedent set by the Marshall Court is the judicial branch should set standards for interpreting the Constitution.
It refers to the process whereby judges follow previously decided cases where the facts are of sufficient similarity. This doctrine of judicial precedent involves an application of the principle of stare to stand by the decided. In practice, this means that inferior courts are bound to apply the legal principles set down by superior courts in earlier cases. This provides consistency and predictability in the law.
Therefore, the statement that best describes a precedent set by the Marshall Court is the judicial branch should set standards for interpreting the Constitution.
Read more about judicial precedent
brainly.com/question/24241346
#SPJ1