Brayden should dispose of the gum.
In the presented scenario the law in Singapore says that chewing gum is illegal. As far as Brayden is in Singapore he should concede with the law there.
The equal security clause is a provision of law that says that all citizens must have ministered equally under the law. Although this provides one the right to take retained actions, in this case, Brayden can be restricted from chewing gum.
If he is entitled to carry chewing gum then he hopes to be treated differently from others in Singapore. This disregards the equal protection clause.
To learn more about The law in Singapore visit the link
https://brainly.com/question/24016343
#SPJ4