Respuesta :
Two independent fingerprint experts have come to the conclusion that the suspect cannot be the origin of the print. This situation demonstrates how reliable fingerprint analysis is across different people.
In court, fingerprint examiners frequently claim to have "100% assurance" that a match has occurred. To testify about a match in probabilistic terms is, in fact, against their professional standards. This is quite odd because fingerprint recognition must by its very nature include probability. We encourage criminal suspects to remember their rights and maintain composure even when they are led to believe that the evidence points to their conviction. Individual fingerprints serve as a reliable form of identification. However, they are never the only proof that someone committed a crime. It can appear that everyone utilizes fingerprints and immediately makes an arrest based on such information. However, a person accused of committing a crime might not be convicted based solely on their fingerprints. Each person's fingerprint has a unique pattern, making them potentially unique.
Know more about fingerprint examiners:
https://brainly.com/question/14926757
#SPJ4
