- The score that you must earn on your second jump to beat your competitor is x > 119.8.
- Both the coach and the teammate are correct because a score of "118.4" and "117.5" are greater than a score of "117.1."
What is an inequality?
An inequality can be defined as a mathematical relation that compares two (2) or more integers and variables in an equation based on any of the following arguments:
- Less than (<).
- Greater than (>).
- Less than or equal to (≤).
- Greater than or equal to (≥).
In this exercise, you're required to describe the score which this ski jumper must earn on the second jump to beat his or her competitor. Therefore, let x represent the score of his or her second acrobatic ski jump.
Based on the competitor's score of 119.8 in the second jump, this ski jumper must earn the following score represented by this inequality:
x > 119.8
Who is correct?
From the table (see attachment), we can logically deduce that the competitor's score in the first ski jump is equal to 117.1. This ultimately implies that, the ski jumper's score can be modeled by this inequality:
x > 117.1
In this context, we can reasonably infer and logically deduce that both the coach and the teammate are correct because a score of "118.4" and "117.5" are greater than a score of "117.1."
Read more on inequality here: brainly.com/question/6666926
#SPJ1
Complete Question:
MAKING AN ARGUMENT
In an aerial ski competition, you perform two acrobatic ski jumps. The scores on the two jumps are then added together.
a. Describe the score that you must earn on your second jump to beat your competitor.
b. Your coach says that you will beat your competitor if you score 118.4 points. A teammate says that you only need 117.5 points. Who is correct? Explain.
