kevin sells roman coins. he knows jen is a coin collector, and he sends jen a letter stating that he collector, and he sends jen a letter stating that he has a julius caesar coin he is willing to sell for has a julius caesar coin he is willing to sell for $2500. jen signs and returns the letter but adds $2500. jen signs and returns the letter but adds nothing more than her signature. kevin mails the nothing more than her signature. kevin mails the coin to jen and requests payment, but jen sends coin to jen and requests payment, but jen sends the coin back claiming they do not have a contract. the coin back claiming they do not have a contract. what standard will the court use to determine what standard will the court use to determine whether they have a contract?

A contract is a legally enforceable settlement that creates, defines, and governs mutual rights and responsibilities among its parties.[1] An agreement normally involves the transfer of goods, services, money, or a promise to transfer any of these at a future date. In the event of a breach of settlement, the injured birthday party may also are trying to find judicial treatments together with damages or rescission.[2] contract law, the sphere of the regulation of obligations worried to contracts, is primarily based on the precept that agreements must be honored.

Learn more about contract here

https://brainly.com/question/984979

#SPJ4