The belief that what is right in some circumstances is not necessarily right in others cannot be held by ethical objectivists. If two humans have equal ethical values, then they'll always attain the same conclusions about what is proper and incorrect. there may be no goal proper and wrong.
The theory of moral objectivism holds that ethical requirements do certainly exist independently of human social creations, and ethical relativism holds that they may be simply human innovations. This isn't always virtually an issue of anthropological curiosity concerning how extraordinary people and cultures view morality.
In ethical objectivism moral values and virtues are intrinsic, not dependent on whatever outside of them. In ethical objectivism ethical law is uncreated and everlasting and no longer problem to any will, divine or human. (One form of moral objectivism is moral absolutism.)
Learn more about ethical objectivism here:https://brainly.com/question/8590887
#SPJ4
