Respuesta :
The argument that would be made to the CEO would be based on the fact that there are complementarities of cost as well as economies of scope.
The argument that is to be made
Cost complementarities and economies of scope are likely to occur given the tightly linked marine engine and shipbuilding sectors.
Eliminating marine engine division can actually increase the costs of the shipbuilding division, making the shipbuilding division non-profitable.
Showing the CEO that quadratic multi-product, a cost function presents cost complementarities and an economies of scope, which will occur when a 0andf-aQ1Q2> 0, respectively, and compare the profitability under various scenarios would help this particular argument withstand criticism.
My justification for maintaining the distinction is as follows:
Our division is still growing and needs a few more years to reach its full potential.
Additionally, we introduced new equipment (technology) last year, which helped us cut costs by 10%. This year, thanks to our employees' thorough training on the new platform, we may cut costs even more in the upcoming fiscal year.
And because of the fresh investment in fixed capital, the division has suffered losses. i.e., even while total costs exceed entire revenues. The price of output is higher than the average variable cost.
As a result, the company has every right to continue operating because its AVC is greater than the price.
Read more on business competitions here: https://brainly.com/question/24625436
#SPJ1