Respuesta :
Yes, as the Compromise of 1850 served as a temporary truce on the subject of slavery, particularly addressing the status of recently acquired territory following the Mexican American War, I see room for compromise between proponents and opponents of slavery expansion.
A set of laws known as the Compromise of 1850 were proposed by U.S. Senator Henry Clay and enacted by the U.S. Congress in an effort to address several slavery-related issues and keep the Union together. The controversy started when the territory of California asked to join the Union with a constitution that forbade slavery.
Multiple components made up the Compromise of 1850. They included the establishment of Texas's borders and the admission of California as a free state. Texas also ceded portions of its territory, which later became known as New Mexico and Utah. The Fugitive Slave Act was approved, and the slave trade was also outlawed in the District of Columbia.
The Compromise of 1850 was successful as a short-term solution, but it also demonstrated that when important sectional interests in the United States were at issue, compromise was not a long-term political option. The Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 sparked an outcry across the North, and even moderate opponents of slavery turned against any future expansion of slavery into the territories.
Learn more about 'compromise of 1850’ here:
https://brainly.com/question/1074838
#SPJ4
Complete question:
Do you see any ground for compromise between supporter and opponent of slavery expansion?
