The speed of the transformation, the major cause(s), and even the existence of the Industrial Revolution have been three of the major areas of contention between historians.
Although there has been debate over what precisely qualifies as an industrial revolution, the majority of historians generally accept that there was an industrial revolution (which is a start). Phyliss Deane spoke of a continuing, self-sustaining economic expansion with significant generational increases in consumption and output.
The obvious question is what triggered the revolution, assuming there was one to begin with and putting speed aside for the time being. There are two schools of thinking regarding this among historians. One idea assumes that a single industry will cause the others to "go off," whereas a second one proposes a slower, longer-term growth of numerous interrelated elements.
To learn more about Industrial Revolution please click on below link
https://brainly.com/question/855594
#SPJ4