The major difference is Chinese immigrants found a variety of jobs, according to sinn's, so miners' taxes meant little to them. According to Pfaelzer, Chinese were exempt from the miner's tax. Because most of their work is there.
A large number of Chinese immigrants arrived in the western United States between 1850 and 1860. There were also many immigrants from other parts of Asia, but the Chinese were by far the most prominent group.
Other parts of the United States also welcomed large numbers of European immigrants at the same time. Despite this, there were also many Latin Americans in these areas.
The population of this region increased as a result of immigration to the Pacific coast. For this reason, in order to organize this region, it was necessary to form a state that could accommodate all these people.
Hence, this is the one major difference between sinn’s and pfaelzer’s historical interpretations of immigration to the pacific coast of the united states during the 1850s and 1860s.
To learn more about sinn's and pfaelzer's here:
https://brainly.com/question/21091918
#SPJ4
