briefly describe one major difference between sinn’s and pfaelzer’s historical interpretations of immigration to the pacific coast of the united states during the 1850s and 1860s.

Respuesta :

hbhbiphniiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii

Chinese immigrants, according to Sinn, found a variety of jobs, therefore the miner's tax had little bearing on them. According to Pfaelzer, the Chinese were singled out by the miner's tax because that is where the majority of their jobs were located.

Chinese immigrants came to the western US in great numbers between 1850 and 1860. Although there were also many immigrants from other parts of Asia, the Chinese were by far the most noticeable group.

The other US regions also welcomed many European immigrants at the same time. Nevertheless, there were also a lot of Latin Americans in these areas.

The population of that region increased as a result of immigration to the Pacific coast. Due to this, states that could accommodate all of these people had to be established to organize the area.

Learn more about Sinn's and Pfaelzer's historical interpretations here:

https://brainly.com/question/21091918

#SPJ4