An crimination against people from the west is of the following is not a posible explanation for this wape differential.
In both a criminal and civil action, a defendant may exercise his privilege against self-incrimination. However, in a law suit, the jury could be permitted to draw particular conclusions from the defendant's silence, and the defendant might be prohibited from offering specific types of proof.
People are protected from being forced to implicate themselves by the Fifth Amendment. Individuals are protected from self-incrimination under this constitutional protection. Therefore, a voluntary ego statement may be admitted into evidence in court. Before an arrest, soul remarks may be presented as evidence in court.
To know more about Incrimination visit:
https://brainly.com/question/12693322
#SPJ4