Respuesta :
The given statement is true. "No private property should be taken for the purpose of the public, without just recompense," states the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution.
Private property cannot be taken for public use without just compensation, according to the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution. Such a take is said to result in an implied agreement to pay compensation. We have ruled that we lack the jurisdiction to resolve claims for unliquidated damages when the legal obligation of the United States to provide just compensation for the "taking" of private property has been established. However, such claims will only be granted in cases where the evidence of record allows for a substantially accurate calculation of the amount due.
The government must be able to demonstrate that the proposed use is public, that the public interest needs it, and that the property is required for that reason if a property owner challenges the legal basis for the seizure. Given these circumstances, stopping an eminent domain seizure is often quite challenging.
To learn more about Fifth Amendment please click on the given link: https://brainly.com/question/23133781
#SPJ4
