Judicial review (JR) is the process of questioning the legality of decisions made by public bodies, usually local or central. When a JR claim is successful, the decision is typically "quashed" or nullified.
Option 3 is the correct answer because Judicial review is the idea, fundamental to the US system of government, that the actions of the legislative and executive branches of government are subject to review and possible invalidation by the judiciary, it has the power to determine and review if laws or acts of governments are unconstitutional.
- Option 1 is incorrect because the capacity to propose new laws that the legislative branch must pass is not conceivable under judicial review since any activity that disagrees with the constitution is ruled unconstitutional and hence annulled.
- Option 2 is incorrect because judicial review is the power of an independent court, citizens cannot be forced to follow the decisions of judges.
- Option 4 is incorrect because judicial review's purpose is to examine whether the actions of other government components are constitutional, therefore it will not primarily determine which cases will be reviewed by the United States Supreme Court.
For more information relating to judicial review, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/20214003
