Respuesta :
Hello!
Well, The title of To Kill a Mockingbird has very little literal connection to the plot, but it carries a great deal of symbolic weight in the book. In this story of innocents destroyed by evil, the “mockingbird” comes to represent the idea of innocence. Thus, to kill a mockingbird is to destroy innocence. Throughout the book, a number of characters (Jem, Tom Robinson, Dill, Boo Radley, Mr. Raymond) can be identified as mockingbirds—innocents who have been injured or destroyed through contact with evil. This connection between the novel’s title and its main theme is made explicit several times in the novel: after Tom Robinson is shot, Mr. Underwood compares his death to “the senseless slaughter of songbirds,” and at the end of the book Scout thinks that hurting Boo Radley would be like “shootin’ a mockingbird.” Most important, Miss Maudie explains to Scout: “Mockingbirds don’t do one thing but . . . sing their hearts out for us. That’s why it’s a sin to kill a mockingbird.” That Jem and Scout’s last name is Finch (another type of small bird) indicates that they are particularly vulnerable in the racist world of Maycomb, which often treats the fragile innocence of childhood harshly.
Hope this Helps! Have A Wonderful Day! :)
Well, The title of To Kill a Mockingbird has very little literal connection to the plot, but it carries a great deal of symbolic weight in the book. In this story of innocents destroyed by evil, the “mockingbird” comes to represent the idea of innocence. Thus, to kill a mockingbird is to destroy innocence. Throughout the book, a number of characters (Jem, Tom Robinson, Dill, Boo Radley, Mr. Raymond) can be identified as mockingbirds—innocents who have been injured or destroyed through contact with evil. This connection between the novel’s title and its main theme is made explicit several times in the novel: after Tom Robinson is shot, Mr. Underwood compares his death to “the senseless slaughter of songbirds,” and at the end of the book Scout thinks that hurting Boo Radley would be like “shootin’ a mockingbird.” Most important, Miss Maudie explains to Scout: “Mockingbirds don’t do one thing but . . . sing their hearts out for us. That’s why it’s a sin to kill a mockingbird.” That Jem and Scout’s last name is Finch (another type of small bird) indicates that they are particularly vulnerable in the racist world of Maycomb, which often treats the fragile innocence of childhood harshly.
Hope this Helps! Have A Wonderful Day! :)
The title of To Kill a Mockingbird has almost no definite association with the plot, yet it carries a lot of representative load in the book. In this account of honest people blotted out by the aberrant, the "mockingbird" comes up against the possibility of innocence. Following these lines, killing a mockingbird means erasing honesty. Throughout the book, some characters can be distinguished as honest and ridiculous people who have been harmed or erased by contact with evil. This association between the clever's title and his main argument is made unambiguous a few times in the book: After Tom Robinson is killed, Mr. Underwood analyzes his transition to "the foolish butcher of larks" and towards the end of the book. Scout feels that stinging Boo Radley would be like "shooting a thrush". Most significantly, Miss Maudie makes it clear to Scout: "Thrushes still don't do a certain thing ... they sing their hearts out for us. This is why it's wrong to kill a mocking thrush." The fact that Jem and Scout's surname is Finch shows that they are particularly helpless in Maycomb's bigoted universe, which regularly treats the delicate honesty of adolescence brutally.