A government passes a law increasing taxes on banks. Two days later, there are server al bank robberies. A politician who opposed the taxes claims that the new law is causing bank robberies. What is wrong with the politician's argument?
There is no stable ground reason to prove that increasing taxes is what cause the robberies. Besides that there is always planning and needing to know the banks routes as well as time managing and picking the right day. Its not going to take two days to rob several banks without having a lot of mess ups. ( My dad was going into law enforcement some years back and I remember this was one of the things he was talking about.) hope this helps! :-D
