Answer:
No
Step-by-step explanation:
This is a case of affirming the consequent fallacy. This formal fallacy has the form:
P -> Q
Q
-------
P
The name affirming the consequent derives from using the consequent, Q, to conclude the antecedent P.
In this case, P is "it is midnight" and Q is "the sun is not shining", and the statement is false because the cause of the sun is not be shining could be, for example, an eclipse, not because is midnight
