Read the speech James I made to Parliament in 1609.

The state of monarchy is the supremest thing upon earth, for kings are not only God's lieutenants upon earth and sit upon God's throne, but even by God himself they are called gods. . . .

[Y]ou do not meddle with the main points of government; that is my craft . . . to meddle with that were to lessen me.

What argument was the king making?

Kings should not believe in God, for they are gods themselves.

Kings are God’s representatives on Earth, and they should not be challenged.

Kings should agree that it is Parliament’s job to run the government.

Kings need to be more respectful of Parliament.

The discourse that James I provided for the Parliament is confined in the hypothesis of the divine right of the rulers, a thought that strengthened the monarchical absolutism, while setting up that the expert of a lord to oversee originated from the desire of the deity of the general people who rule, and not of any transient specialist, not even of the desire of his subjects or of any testament.

Picked by his divinity, a ruler was just capable before him, and he had just to respond in due order regarding his actions before God.

AkshayG AkshayG · Answer 2 · 2019-10-02T15:31:19+02:00

Kings are God’s representatives on Earth, and they should not be challenged.

King James I of Scotland was the successor of Queen Elizabeth I. Under his rule, the kingdoms of England and Scotland were united into one kingdom and was termed as the United Kingdom. He was made the monarch of Scotland, after a section of prominent Protestant lords deposed his mother, Mary Queen of Scots, who was eventually executed by Queen Elizabeth in 1587, after nineteen years of imprisonment.

Further Explanation:

The main ideology behind the speech made by King James I to the members of the Parliament was to assert the theory of ‘Divine Kingship’ by which the king was chosen by God to rule over his subjects. The theory of Divine kingship strengthens the divine claim of a king as a representative of God on Earth. King James I also wanted to project himself as the ‘parens patriae’ a parallel authority as a patriarch who was responsible for the welfare of his subjects and regarded them as members of his family. Thus, the patriarchal structure of English society has been projected through these ideals propagated by the king. It can also be interpreted as a representation of the human body, where the mind controls all the vital body functions. The political argument established monarchy as the natural form of government. The King cited the evidence for his arguments within the pages of Biblical literature, where Adam was considered to be the first husband, the first father and the first king respectively. Thus, we can state that the arguments of King James I involve the theory of ‘macrocosms’ and ‘microcosms’ in which the larger authority is represented in a miniature form. Thus God, King, and Father all were established as nodal points of authority on larger and smaller scales.

Learn more:

1. Which explains why supreme court justices are given lifetime appointments? https://brainly.com/question/1194306

2. During the 1925 scopes trial, the defence’s main argument was thathttps://brainly.com/question/10929168

Answer Details-:

Grade: High School, Graduation

Chapter: The Golden Age of England.

Subject: History

Keywords: Monarchy, Divine kingship, representative of God on Earth, Biblical literature, parens patriae, macrocosms, and microcosms.