Respuesta :
The answer cannot be a because appointing all federal judges would lead to a very "one-sided" jurisdiction and promotes bias. It cannot be b either because the supreme court on average only accepts 80 cases a year though it receives thousands of requests. C is also incorrect because the supreme court does not practice "judicial restraint" it is actually known as "judicial review". The difference? The supreme court can only uphold and postpone a victim or defendants ruling until the court has come to the final decision. Therefor judicial restraint only represents a miniscule version of judicial review. So the answer is inevitably d.It determines whether any actions by the executive and legislative branches are unconstitutional. Hope this helps :)
The supreme court serves US federal government as :
d . It determines whether any actions by the executive and legislative branches are unconstitutional.
Reason for other option :
a. Because appointing all federal judges would lead to a very "one-sided" jurisdiction and promotes bias.
b. It cannot be either because the supreme court on average only accepts 80 cases a year though it receives thousands of requests .
c. It is also incorrect because the supreme court does not practice "judicial restraint" it is actually known as "judicial review .
Therefor judicial restraint only represents a minuscule version of judicial review .
For more information , https://brainly.com/question/1755400?referrer=searchResults