Respuesta :
Answer:
The novel and the movie adaptation of The Lord of the Rings are both very well-made and enjoyable stories. However, there are some key differences between the two works.
One of the most significant differences is the ending. In the novel, Frodo and Sam destroy the One Ring, but they are both killed in the process. In the movie, Frodo and Sam are able to destroy the One Ring and survive. This change has a significant impact on the story, as it means that Frodo and Sam are able to return home and live happily ever after.
Another difference between the novel and the movie is the character of Gollum. In the novel, Gollum is a much more sympathetic character. He is shown to be a victim of the One Ring, and he is ultimately redeemed by his sacrifice. In the movie, Gollum is a much more sinister character. He is shown to be a willing servant of the One Ring, and he is ultimately killed by Frodo.
Finally, the movie adaptation of The Lord of the Rings is much shorter than the novel. This is due to the fact that the movie had to be condensed into a three-hour runtime. As a result, some of the plot elements from the novel were left out of the movie.
Overall, both the novel and the movie adaptation of The Lord of the Rings are excellent works of fiction. However, there are some key differences between the two works. These differences include the ending, the character of Gollum, and the length of the story.
The ending of the movie is significantly different than that of the novel. In the novel, Frodo and Sam destroy the One Ring, but they are both killed in the process. In the movie, Frodo and Sam are able to destroy the One Ring and survive. This change has a significant impact on the story, as it means that Frodo and Sam are able to return home and live happily ever after.
In the novel, Frodo and Sam's journey is a tragic one. They are both ultimately killed in the process of destroying the One Ring. This is a powerful and moving ending, as it shows the true cost of heroism. However, it is also a somewhat depressing ending, as it means that Frodo and Sam are never able to return home to their loved ones.
In the movie, Frodo and Sam's journey is a more triumphant one. They are able to destroy the One Ring and survive. This is a more uplifting ending, as it means that Frodo and Sam are able to return home and live happily ever after. However, it is also a somewhat less powerful ending, as it does not show the true cost of heroism.
I think the filmmakers made the change to the ending of the movie because they wanted to give Frodo and Sam a happy ending. They wanted the audience to feel good about the characters and their journey. However, I think the change also makes the story a bit less powerful. The novel's ending is a more tragic and moving one, and it shows the true cost of heroism.