Answer:
A group of businesses wanted to gather business at a city and reduced business with those who didn't contribute, the Portland Hilton Hotel threatened a supplier to cut off business unless they contributed. This violated the federal antitrust laws. Hilton was charged as guilty but later appealed, saying that the manager and assistant manager tried to convince the purchasing agent not to cut off the business, sayng that they should follow corporate policy and purchase supplies based on price, quality, and service, instead of on the basis of contribution of the convention of business. Now, it is up to you to decide, should the verdict be changed as the 2 purchasing agent was the one who didn't follow corporate policy and the law?
Explanation:
