Respuesta :
Answer:
Please check your answer
Explanation:
Assertion (A): Some national leaders feared creating new states on a linguistic basis.
Reason (R): The Central Government resisted linguistic states.
Both the assertion and the reason seem to be accurate in the context of certain historical situations, particularly in India around the time of independence and partition.
Explanation:
- Assertion (A): Some national leaders, particularly those concerned with maintaining national unity and cohesion, were indeed apprehensive about creating new states solely on linguistic lines. They feared that such divisions could lead to further fragmentation and internal conflicts within the country.
- Reason (R): The Central Government in India did resist the idea of linguistic states initially. The idea of linguistic states was advocated by leaders like Potti Sreeramulu and was a significant factor in the reorganization of states in India in the 1950s. However, the process was not without opposition, and there were concerns about potential administrative challenges and political implications.
Overall, both assertion and reason seem to be consistent with historical events, particularly in the context of the linguistic reorganization of states in India.
