Respuesta :
Answer:
Option C
Explanation:
The right to an attorney after being accused of the crime was the civil liberty established through the supreme courts Miranda vs Arizona decision. The supreme court versus Miranda was a 1966 case in which the supreme court ruled that police will have to inform the detained criminal or the suspect about their constitutional right to an attorney and self incrimination. The case began when police arrested Ernesto Miranda and charged him with kidnapping and robbery. He first appealed to the Arizona court and later to the supreme court. The supreme court referred to the fifth and sixth constitutional Amendments and ruled that Criminal suspects have the right to refuse to be a witness against himself and also that criminal defendants have the right to an attorney.
