contestada

of Great Britain and Ireland or the western coasts of Europe or any of the ports controlled by the enemies of
Germany within the Mediterranean.
It is a war against all nations. American ships have been sunk, American lives taken, in ways which it has
stirred us very deeply to learn of, but the ships and people of other neutral and friendly nations have been
sunk and overwhelmed in the waters in the same way. There has been no discrimination. The challenge is
to all mankind. Each nation must decide for itself how it will meet it. The choice we make for ourselves must
be made with a moderation of counsel and a temperateness of judgment befitting our character and our
motives as a nation. We must put excited feelings away. Our motive will not be revenge or the victorious
assertion of the physical might of the nation, but only the vindication of right, of human right, of which we
are only a single champion.
Which best states if the speech is effective or ineffective?
Oineffective because it still involves the U.S. in a World War
effective because President Wilson outlines the emotional reasons for entering the war
effective because President Wilson is a good, strong speaker
ineffective because the speech made Congress angry
ง

Respuesta :

GinnyAnswer
The speech can be considered effective because President Wilson emphasizes the broader significance of the conflict beyond just the United States. By stating that it is a war against all nations and highlighting that American ships and lives were not the only ones affected, Wilson appeals to a sense of shared humanity and the universal importance of upholding human rights. This approach aims to garner support not just based on national interests, but on moral grounds that transcend borders.

Furthermore, President Wilson's call for a decision by each nation on how to respond to the challenge shows a respect for sovereignty and self-determination, which can be seen as a diplomatic and inclusive approach to rallying support for a cause. The speech focuses on the vindication of human rights rather than revenge or a show of strength, portraying the U.S. as a champion of justice and fairness.

Overall, the effectiveness of the speech lies in its appeal to common values and principles that extend beyond national boundaries, as well as in its emphasis on a measured and principled response to the situation at hand. This can resonate with a wider audience and garner support based on shared ideals rather than just national interests.

Otras preguntas