Answer:
Venus is nearer to the Sun, and gets relatively more power from it. Earth is 93 million miles from the Sun, by and large, while Venus is just 67.25 million (by and large) from the Sun. Since the force of the Sun's radiation diminishes with remove from it as 1 over r-squared, Venus gets (93/67.25) squared, or 1.91 times the power for each unit range that Earth gets, all things considered.
Since the emanating temperature of a confined body in space fluctuates as the fourth-foundation of the power occurrence upon it, by the Stefan-Boltzmann law, the transmitting temperature of Venus ought to be the fourth-base of 1.91 = 1.18 times that of the Earth. Moreover, since the environmental weight differs as the temperature, the temperature at any given weight level in the Venusian air ought to be 1.18 times the temperature at that same weight level in the Earth climate, INDEPENDENT OF ANY INFRARED ABSORPTION in the air. Specifically, the found the middle value of temperature at 1000 millibars on Earth is around 15ÂşC = 288K, so the comparing temperature on Venus, WITHOUT ANY GREENHOUSE EFFECT, ought to be 1.18 times that, or 339K. Yet, this is only 66ÂşC, the temperature we really find there from the temperature and weight profiles for Venus.
So there is no nursery impact. You have recently demonstrated that atmosphere science is totally wrong to suspect something. This is the embarrassment that such huge numbers of "specialists" in atmosphere science, and all the logical experts, won't confront. Tune in to the physicists that let you know there is no nursery impact; they know without going to the Venus information - and I am one of them. The proceeding with ineptitude on this fundamental point among such a significant number of researchers, for over a century, is stunning, and deplorable..
