arias13ka
contestada

Read Justice John Paul Stevens’s dissenting opinion in the Citizens United case.

At bottom, the Court's opinion is thus a rejection of the common sense of the American people, who have recognized a need to prevent corporations from undermining self government since the founding, and who have fought against the distinctive corrupting potential of corporate electioneering since the days of Theodore Roosevelt. –Justice Stevens Dissenting Opinion Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission

What does Justice Stevens say about the Court’s ruling?
A. Corporate money will make elections more likely to reflect the public will.
B. Corporate money will have no influence on elections.
C. Corporate money has changed since the days of Theodore Roosevelt.
D. Corporate money will make elections less likely to reflect the public will.

Respuesta :

Corporate money will make elections less likely to reflect the public will.
Martebi

Justice Stevens did say about the Court’s ruling  that Corporate money will make elections less likely to reflect the public will.

What was the dissenting opinion in Citizens United v FEC?

Associate Justice John Paul Stevens  was said to have declared that the court's ruling stands as a kind of "a rejection of the common sense of the American citizen, who have seen a need to hinder corporations from looking low at self government."

The Court was said to have ruled, in5-4, that the First Amendment hinders or place a limits on corporate funding of independent broadcasts in terms of candidate election.

Learn more about  Court’s ruling from

https://brainly.com/question/1786165

Otras preguntas