Sejnowski rejected the usual top-down approach to reproducing human speech. He threw out the fat dictionaries of pronunciation and programs brimming with the rules of phonetics and the tedious list of exceptions to all the previous rules, which had no rhyme or reason. Instead, he replaced all this with a surprisingly simple neural circuit.

What is the author’s purpose for including this statement?
to prove Sejnowski’s credentials
to clarify how linguists teach speech
to criticize robots with neural circuits
to praise Sejnowski’s innovation

In this excerpt, there are several examples that show how the author admires Sejnowski's innovation. The author belittles previous research by citing the "fat dictionaries of pronunciation" and "the tedious list of exceptions... which had no rhyme or reason." In contrast, he argues that Sejnowski's innovation was "surprisingly simple." It is clear that the author thinks this innovation is better that previous methods and wants to give it the praise he thinks it deserves.

ProfChris1 ProfChris1 · Answer 2 · 2022-04-13T11:42:00+02:00

We can deduce that the author’s purpose for including this statement is: to praise Sejnowski’s innovation. Sejnowski came up with an innovation which he was praised for.

Let's understand what innovation is all about below:

What is innovation?

Innovation refers to the introduction or production of a new good, service or idea which stems from practical application of technology and science. Innovation is an aspect that has helped to build civilization over the years.

We can see that the author's purpose was actually to praise Sejnowski’s innovation.

Learn more about innovation on https://brainly.com/question/19969274