Respuesta :
Microphones, either stationary or hidden in the actors' props and costumes, impeded the movements of actors.
Answer:
The emergence of sound, as predicted, wreaked havoc on the motion picture industry (as satirised and highlighted in the film Singin' in the Rain (1952)). The transition from silent to sound pictures, on the other hand, was not entirely disastrous or disruptive.
Explanation:
Every major Hollywood studio began producing two versions of their film releases - in a systematic and logical manner. The plots of the two versions differed in several circumstances (with either alternative takes, reversed sequences, or changed endings). All Quiet on the Western Front (1930), for example, featured two versions: a'silent' version (with music and effects) and a'sound' one.
Many Hollywood performers and actresses lacked strong voices and stage experience, reducing their marketability. To avoid picking up camera noise on the soundtrack, camera motions were restricted, and loud, cumbersome movie cameras had to be housed in awkward, massive sound-insulated booths with blimps (sound-proof covers). Acting degraded as studios sought to capture live speech because actors were hampered by stationary or hidden microphones (in their costumes or other stage items). Some of the first talkies were badly constructed, self-conscious movies with an immovable microphone, aiming to profit on sound's novelty.
For further details refer link:
https://brainly.com/question/22195981?referrer=searchResults
