In Monster, the statement which best supports the idea that Mr. Sawicki´s opinion of Steve is valid is " Mr. Sawicki has known Steve for three years".
The first answer cannot be the right one since being gifted with some skills and having a quick mind have nothing to do with being able to make a good judgement of another person.
In the second answer the fact that Mr. Sawicki works as a teacher and leads a film club does not imply that his opinion is valid because no job can validate the opinion of someone.
The information given in the third answer is irrelevant. Steve planning to do a project over the holidays does not give any information which back up Mr Sawicki's reasoning.
However,in the fourth answer, having known someone for three years means that you have spent a long time together and ,thus, have built a solid idea of how the character of one person is.
Mr. Sawicki has known Steve for three years is the statement best supports the idea that Mr. Sawicki's opinion of Steve is valid. Hence, option D is correct.
They had actually known one another for a long, three years to be exact. The assertion is therefore true in this situation. This comment serves as an example of the familiarity that people get after spending a lot of time together or having associations with one another.
No job can legitimize an individual's opinion, the second response does not indicate that Mr. Sawicki's leadership of a film club and employment as a teacher makes his opinion valid.
The third response's information is irrelevant. Steve's announcement that he will work on a project during the holidays does not provide any facts to support Mr. Sawicki's argument.
Thus, option D is correct.
For more details about concept of the question, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/14337115
#SPJ6
