Respuesta :
The Gideon v. Wainwright court case changed the legal system we know because it re-established the idea that those who cannot afford attorneys need to be provided one. The 6th amendment of the constitution says that individuals have a right to a jury trial as well as the right to an attorney. This case reassures that an attorney should be appointed regardless of what type of crime is committed.
The Supreme Court justices, who voted unanimously for Gideon, discussed how appointing an attorney to those who cannot afford one is part of creating a fair and equal justice system.
The Supreme Court justices, who voted unanimously for Gideon, discussed how appointing an attorney to those who cannot afford one is part of creating a fair and equal justice system.
Answer:
this is the sample response
Explanation:
Responses will vary. A sample response follows: Clarence Gideon was accused of robbery, but could not afford an attorney. The state of Florida refused to provide an attorney for him, so Gideon was forced to defend himself and lost. He appealed, and during the case of Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) the Supreme Court ruled that everyone -- even those that cannot afford it -- deserve the right to an attorney. The effect of this change is that money is not an impediment to justice. Everyone, even those who cannot afford it, now have the right to a knowledgeable defender.